Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE Already a subscriber? LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation5

Case Law

Townstone seeking industry help to fight CFPB

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
0 comments
Case Law
Tuesday, October 27, 2020

A small Chicago mortgage company is asking the financial services industry for help in its fight against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The bureau filed a lawsuit against Townstone Financial in July for alleged violations of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and redlining.

Townstone filed a motion to dismiss the suit this week in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The company also has launched a website, Townstone Fights for Free Speech.com, seeking donations to the James Madison Center for Speech.

“The CFPB has taken the unprecedented step of filing suit against a small, three-person business accusing it of discrimination based on its political speech about the crime rate and in support of police in Chicago,” Townstone attorney Richard Horn of Garris Horn LLP said in an emailed statement. “Townstone is fighting back to protect its right to free speech and yours. While Townstone wants to fight, because it is such a small business, it is facing tremendous economic pressure to settle this case. Unfortunately, any settlement would have negative impacts on everyone’s right to free speech.”

Townstone is also represented by James Bopp Jr. of The Bopp Law Firm, Sean Burke of Mattingly Burke Cohen & Biederman LLP and Marx Sterbcow of The Sterbcow Law Group LLC.

Also see: A year later, CFPB cites Townstone for ECOA violations

Townstone is being charged with making statements during marketing ventures, including weekly radio shows and podcasts, that illegally discouraged prospective African American applicants from applying to the company for mortgage loans.

The CFPB also said the company’s public statements in those marketing vehicles engaged in “illegal redlining” by discouraging prospective applicants living in African American neighborhoods in the Chicago metropolitan statistical area from applying to Townstone for mortgages.

Townstone’s statement on the website accuses the CFPB of using fair lending laws to attack the First Amendment right to free speech of everyone in the financial services industry.

“The CFPB claims that several discussions on Townstone’s radio show and podcast relating to current events, such as the crime rate in Chicago and in support of the police, which lasted only a few minutes out of hundreds of hours of broadcasting, violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,” the statement said. “The CFPB wants to make it the law that speech about the crime rate in our cities is discriminatory against African Americans and illegal! Please donate to stop the CFPB.

“In addition, the CFPB says Townstone did not receive enough applications from African Americans despite Townstone’s business model which is to advertise on the largest Chicago AM radio stations seven  days a week, whose signal hits every Zip code in Chicagoland and reaches several other states. The programming on these stations ranges from all of the major Chicago sports teams’ broadcasts to normal every day talk radio.

“All of us have to understand that if Townstone has to settle because of the financial strain of this lawsuit, this dangerous CFPB legal theory that tramples on the First Amendment will filter down to businesses in the financial services industry and other industries. Please donate to stop the CFPB.”

Townstone’s attorneys alleged the CFPB is using its lawsuit to require:

  • New hiring demographic quotas based on race and ethnicity
  • Requirements to advertise specifically to every racial group and demographic
  • An advertising “Equal Time” Rule requiring financial services companies to advertise based on the political leanings of each media outlet.

“Please understand that if Townstone has to settle, this CFPB legal theory will be used for hiring quotas and advertising based on politics in the financial services industry, and other industries,” the attorneys added on the website.

Townstone attorneys added that the settlement would mean:

  • Business owners would be forced to advertise equally based on the political leanings of their media outlets. For example, if you are on Fox News, you would need to make sure your advertisements are on an equal amount of time on MSNBC or CNN.
  • Business owners would be forced to advertise in areas based only on demographics rather than sound business judgment and profitability.
  • Business owners would be forced to hire employees based on race and ethnicity rather than qualifications.

Townstone co-counsel are arguing the bureau was using the case to drive advertising away from conservative talk radio, and that the company did, in fact, make active efforts to reach minority audiences.

Townstone alleged the case is based entirely on the fact the company advertised primarily on AM-560, a Salem media radio station, and its owner and staff engaged in speech with which Democrats disagreed.

Townstone also claimed the lawsuit could impose a new Equal Time Rule for the industry’s marketing. The Equal Time Rule is a portion of the Communications Act of 1934 which provides that broadcast licensees must permit equal use of broadcast facilities to all legally qualified candidates for political office and that the broadcast licensee may not censor the candidates’ messages, and the action would establish similar practices as a determination for discrimination in advertising under ECOA.

The statement claims the CFPB referred the investigation, which began in 2017, to the Justice Department but that the department declined to pursue action. Townstone Financial advertised on a number of different radio stations in the Chicago market, including news talk stations AM-720 and AM-890 and sports talk station AM-670. At issue in the CFPB’s investigation, however, was Townstone’s advertising on news talk station AM-560, a conservative radio station.

Townstone also disputed the CFPB’s complaint which said that it did not employ an African-American loan officer, saying the company has employed an African American loan processor in the past, as well as other minority employees, including Hispanic loan officers and Asian employees.

Townstone disputed the CFPB’s allegations that the statements it referenced, which were made on the radio show, were racist. Rather, it said, “the comments are fact-based, citing facts about societal problems in the South Side of Chicago area with violence and the lack of adequate grocery stores.”

The CFPB alleged that Townstone drew fewer mortgage applications from African Americans during the time period that other lenders in the Chicago metropolitan statistical area (MSA). The complaint said analyses of Townstone’s mortgage-loan applications in the Chicago MSA, as compared to its peer lenders during the relevant period, showed disparities between Townstone and its peers that are “statistically significant.”

A CFPB spokesperson said the bureau does not comment on pending litigation.

Today's other top stories
Borrower claims several servicers violated RESPA concerning her loan modification
Housing Affordability Act would raise FHA loan limit
House committee votes to slash CFPB funding
HUD provides $1.8M to support housing for those aging out of foster care
Mortgage credit availability plateaus


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Be the first to leave a comment.

Leave your comment
Please enter a comment.
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please enter the word displayed in the image above. Please enter the word displayed in the image above.
: 
Please enter your name.
: 
Please enter your email address.
This field must contain a valid email address.
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 1301 times.

Monthly Newsletter

RESPA News Monthly
May 2025

Cover Story:

CFPB asks to vacate settlement with Townstone, citing misconduct by CFPB


News by Topic   News by Edition   In-depth Reports   Events   Subscribe
All Rise
Case Law
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
The Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
 
 
RESPA News Monthly
March 2025
RESPA News Monthly
April 2025
RESPA News Monthly
May 2025
Archives
 
2025 State of the Industry
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Archives
 
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
Library       RESPA Defined   About   Other Publications
NAR Settlement Resources
Affiliated Compliance
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Case Law
CFPB Guidance Documents
Enforcement Documents
Federal and State Legislation
Federal Register Notices
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
 
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Model Disclosure Forms
Other Guidance Documents
Position Papers
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Proposed Rules and Regulations
Settlement Agreements
Statements of Policy
Studies and Proposals
 
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
 
RESPA News
Contact / Editors
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
The Title Report
The Legal Description
Valuation Review
Dodd Frank Upate
Copyright © 2005-2025 RESPA News
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.respanews.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> Dodd Frank Update
> The Legal Description
> The Title Report
> Valuation Review
> NS3 The Summit
> Women's Leadership Summit
> October Research, LLC
> The October Store


Loading... Loading...
12 USC Section 2605 or Section 6 is titled Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of escrow accounts. It pertains to qualified written requests, notices of transfer of servicing and the administration of escrow accounts.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
12 USC Section 2609 or Section 10 is titled Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts. It governs escrow accounts including notifications and statements to borrowers. Section 10 also sets out penalties for those who violate the section.
RESPA Section 3 provides that a thing of value includes any payment, advance, funds, loan, service or other consideration

Regulation X says thing of value includes: monies, things, discounts, salaries, commissions, fees, duplicate payments of a charge, stock, dividends, distributions of partnership profits, franchise royalties, credits representing monies that may be paid at a future date, the opportunity to participate in a money-making program, retained or increased earnings, increased equity in a parent or subsidiary entity, special bank deposits or accounts, special or unusual banking terms, services of all types at special or free rates, sales or rentals at special prices or rates, lease or rental payments based in whole or in part on the amount of business referred, trips and payment of another person’s expenses or reduction in credit against an existing obligation.
A form used by a settlement or closing agent itemizing all charges imposed on a borrower and seller in a real estate transaction. This form represents the closing transaction and provides each party with a complete list of incoming and outgoing funds. RESPA requires the HUD-1 to be used as the standard real estate settlement form in all transactions in the U.S. involving federally related mortgage loans.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
EVENTS
LIBRARY
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
All Rise
Case Law
Conference Coverage
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
This Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
Current Edition
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
Archives
2025 State of the Industry
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Best Practices
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
Evolving Realtor Relationships
2025 Economic Outlook Series
CFPB's Shake-Up & Its Impact
Artificial Intelligence for Title
Industry and Regulatory Outlook
RESPA Updates You Need to Know
Evolving Consumer Relationships
Strategies post-NAR settlement
Excess Equity
Securing Your Cyber Network
2024 Economic Forecast Series
Webinar Archives
Cyber Solutions Showcase
NAR Settlement Resources
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Executive Interview Series
eClosing Solutions Showcase
RESPA DEFINED
Affiliated Compliance
Case Law
Disclosure Forms
Enforcement
Federal and State Legislation
Guidance Documents
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
In-Depth Reports
Position Papers and Studies
Rules and Regulations
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
RESPA Glossary
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
Model Disclosure Forms
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Enforcement Documents
Settlement Agreements
CFPB Guidance Documents
Other Guidance Documents
Statements of Policy
Position Papers
Studies and Proposals
Federal Register Notices
Proposed Rules and Regulations
RESPA News
Contact Us
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement