Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE Already a subscriber? LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation5

Industry News, Regulatory News, This Week in Washington

Enterprise reduction in fees sparks reactions from officials, interest groups

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
0 comments
Industry News, Regulatory News, This Week in Washington
Monday, January 23, 2023

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHF)A announced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) would be making changes to their single-family pricing framework by redesigning and recalibrating upfront fee matrices for purchase, rate-term finance, and cash-out refinance loans.

Of note, it was announced the upfront fee for commingled securities would be reduced by 9.375 basis points starting May 1.

In its lender letter announcing the new loan-level price adjustment (LLPA) framework, Fannie Mae said the additional changes build on those the Enterprise announced last year, which included price changes for second homes, high-balance loans, and cash-out refinances, as well as LLPA waivers for certain borrowers and affordable mortgage products.

“We are implementing additional changes to our LLPA framework that represent the next step in our effort to increase support for borrowers historically underserved by the housing finance market while ensuring a level playing field for small and large lenders, fostering capital accumulation, and achieving viable returns on capital,” the letter stated.

“In addition, we are introducing a revamped LLPA matrix that differentiates pricing by loan purpose,” it continued. “By capturing all LLPAs associated with each loan purpose on one page, we believe the new matrix is concise and comprehensive. The redesigned LLPA matrix includes stand-alone, base price grids for purchase loans, limited cash-out refinance loans, and cash-out refinance loans, along with additional LLPAs by loan attribute. The modernized matrix supports pricing model durability through market cycles and conditions.”

FHFA Director Sandra Thompson said the new framework comes as a result of months-long analysis and stakeholder engagement by the FHFA to consider a variety of views on the fee and its potential impacts on the Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security (UMBS) market.

“FHFA is dedicated to preserving the strength and resilience of the UMBS market, given the significant improvement in liquidity and stability that UMBS has afforded the To-Be-Announced (TBA) market,” Thompson said. “To support these objectives, FHFA is committed to maintaining a durable framework that will enable commingling activity to resume in a way that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders to the greatest extent possible.

“As FHFA continues its review of the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework (ERCF) to ensure the ERCF appropriately reflects the risks of the Enterprises’ business activities including commingled securities, the agency appreciates the constructive engagement with all market participants and is committed to ongoing dialogue on this issue,” she added.

National Association of Realtors (NAR) President Kenny Parcell said his organization appreciated the agency’s efforts to revise the structure for loan level pricing adjustments as well as making the 2022 changes permanent.

“NAR and our members were supportive of most of the changes made to LLPAs this past fall, and we will continue to advocate for LLPA reform as the housing market continues to struggle with the sharpest blow to affordability in decades,” he said.

Parcell added these changes make permanent the reduced or eliminated fees for first-time homebuyers and those with low or moderate incomes. They also reduce fees for many borrowers with lower credit scores, but strong down payments.

However, he cautioned, fees are raised on some borrowers with good credit scores and moderate down payments, hitting middle-wealth homebuyers. Additionally, FHFA included new fees on borrowers with higher debt-to-income scores. Parcell said NAR will review other changes in the new LLPA structure and share its concerns with the agency.

“In the wake of a three-percentage point increase in mortgage rates, now is not the time to raise fees on homebuyers,” he concluded. “Furthermore, the FHFA needs to address its recent increase in fees on homebuyers in high-cost markets as well as guarantee fees that impact all homebuyers.  Homebuyers are hurting and these changes are overdue.  Now is the time.”

Bob Broeksmit, Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) president and CEO, said while his organization continues to believe there should not be any fee for commingled securities, it appreciated FHFA’s receptiveness to the industry’s feedback and willingness to make adjustments.

“FHFA’s move to lower the fee significantly for commingled securities is a sound decision and should remove much of the friction observed in the UMBS market since the fee was implemented last summer,” he said. “The UMBS is intended to increase liquidity in the market, but the high fee was having the opposite effect…. [MBA] remain[s] focused on ensuring a well-functioning UMBS market and will continue to work with FHFA, the GSEs, and industry stakeholders on this issue.”

Today's other top stories
Borrower claims several servicers violated RESPA concerning her loan modification
Housing Affordability Act would raise FHA loan limit
House committee votes to slash CFPB funding
HUD provides $1.8M to support housing for those aging out of foster care
Mortgage credit availability plateaus


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Be the first to leave a comment.

Leave your comment
Please enter a comment.
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please enter the word displayed in the image above. Please enter the word displayed in the image above.
: 
Please enter your name.
: 
Please enter your email address.
This field must contain a valid email address.
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 1153 times.

Monthly Newsletter

RESPA News Monthly
May 2025

Cover Story:

CFPB asks to vacate settlement with Townstone, citing misconduct by CFPB


News by Topic   News by Edition   In-depth Reports   Events   Subscribe
All Rise
Case Law
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
The Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
 
 
RESPA News Monthly
March 2025
RESPA News Monthly
April 2025
RESPA News Monthly
May 2025
Archives
 
2025 State of the Industry
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Archives
 
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
Library       RESPA Defined   About   Other Publications
NAR Settlement Resources
Affiliated Compliance
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Case Law
CFPB Guidance Documents
Enforcement Documents
Federal and State Legislation
Federal Register Notices
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
 
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Model Disclosure Forms
Other Guidance Documents
Position Papers
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Proposed Rules and Regulations
Settlement Agreements
Statements of Policy
Studies and Proposals
 
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
 
RESPA News
Contact / Editors
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
The Title Report
The Legal Description
Valuation Review
Dodd Frank Upate
Copyright © 2005-2025 RESPA News
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.respanews.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> Dodd Frank Update
> The Legal Description
> The Title Report
> Valuation Review
> NS3 The Summit
> Women's Leadership Summit
> October Research, LLC
> The October Store


Loading... Loading...
12 USC Section 2605 or Section 6 is titled Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of escrow accounts. It pertains to qualified written requests, notices of transfer of servicing and the administration of escrow accounts.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
12 USC Section 2609 or Section 10 is titled Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts. It governs escrow accounts including notifications and statements to borrowers. Section 10 also sets out penalties for those who violate the section.
RESPA Section 3 provides that a thing of value includes any payment, advance, funds, loan, service or other consideration

Regulation X says thing of value includes: monies, things, discounts, salaries, commissions, fees, duplicate payments of a charge, stock, dividends, distributions of partnership profits, franchise royalties, credits representing monies that may be paid at a future date, the opportunity to participate in a money-making program, retained or increased earnings, increased equity in a parent or subsidiary entity, special bank deposits or accounts, special or unusual banking terms, services of all types at special or free rates, sales or rentals at special prices or rates, lease or rental payments based in whole or in part on the amount of business referred, trips and payment of another person’s expenses or reduction in credit against an existing obligation.
A form used by a settlement or closing agent itemizing all charges imposed on a borrower and seller in a real estate transaction. This form represents the closing transaction and provides each party with a complete list of incoming and outgoing funds. RESPA requires the HUD-1 to be used as the standard real estate settlement form in all transactions in the U.S. involving federally related mortgage loans.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
EVENTS
LIBRARY
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
All Rise
Case Law
Conference Coverage
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
This Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
Current Edition
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
Archives
2025 State of the Industry
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Best Practices
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
Evolving Realtor Relationships
2025 Economic Outlook Series
CFPB's Shake-Up & Its Impact
Artificial Intelligence for Title
Industry and Regulatory Outlook
RESPA Updates You Need to Know
Evolving Consumer Relationships
Strategies post-NAR settlement
Excess Equity
Securing Your Cyber Network
2024 Economic Forecast Series
Webinar Archives
Cyber Solutions Showcase
NAR Settlement Resources
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Executive Interview Series
eClosing Solutions Showcase
RESPA DEFINED
Affiliated Compliance
Case Law
Disclosure Forms
Enforcement
Federal and State Legislation
Guidance Documents
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
In-Depth Reports
Position Papers and Studies
Rules and Regulations
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
RESPA Glossary
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
Model Disclosure Forms
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Enforcement Documents
Settlement Agreements
CFPB Guidance Documents
Other Guidance Documents
Statements of Policy
Position Papers
Studies and Proposals
Federal Register Notices
Proposed Rules and Regulations
RESPA News
Contact Us
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement