A Rhode Island buyer who claimed his servicer failed to respond to a notice of error argued the servicer should reimburse him for the cost of gasoline to visit his attorney and electricity to charge his cell phone to call his lawyer.
The servicer alleged the company’s responses to the borrower’s qualified written requests and notice of errors did not violate RESPA.
Read on for highlights of the judge’s decision.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: