An Alabama borrower whose house was demolished after he failed to make necessary repairs accused his servicer of failing to send explanations to letters related to servicing of his mortgage loan.
The defendants argued the loan was primarily for investment purposes and therefore not covered under RESPA. However, the plaintiff claimed he intended to renovate the property, move into and rent it.
Read on for highlights from the magistrate judge’s opinion.<
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: