An Orange County, Calif., law firm appealing a civil investigative demand is accusing the court-appointed attorney who will argue in support of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s structure of attempting to derail the resolution of the constitutionality question he was supposed to address.
Similar claims are being made by the Department of Justice in Seila Law’s case against the CFPB, which is scheduled for oral arguments before the Supreme Court on March 3.
Read on for more details about the final briefs from the sides.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: