Although the plethora of defendants named in a California lawsuit argued that the plaintiff’s 45-page pro se complaint made it difficult to “disentangle” his allegations, the court zeroed in on his RESPA claim, which alleged that his loan servicers had failed to respond to his qualified written request within the statutorily proscribed period. According to the Eastern District of California, the servicers’ conduct in this case clearly violated the law.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: