Seila Law’s dispute with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) over a civil investigative demand (CID) is not the proper case to decide the constitutionality of the bureau.
That’s according to the amicus brief filed Jan. 15 by court-appointed attorney Paul Clement, who will argue in support of the CFPB’s structure March 3 before the Supreme Court since the Department of Justice (DOJ) has chosen not to defend the constitutionality of the agency.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: