The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stated a viable claim for relief against a mortgage servicer on three out of four alleged RESPA violations, according to a federal judge.
However, the judge dismissed the entire 14-count suit without prejudice after finding the complaint is an impermissible “shotgun” pleading that fails to distinguish among the defendants.
Read on for highlights of the Florida court’s opinion, including its decision to uphold the constitutionality of the bureau.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: