A California family seeking a loan modification filed suit against their servicer, alleging the company repeatedly requested information that they had already provided, a violation of section 1024(b)(1) of RESPA.
The servicer filed for summary judgment on a motion to dismiss, saying it properly processed the family’s application and advised family members of the required documentation.
Read on for highlights of the magistrate judge’s opinion, which also dismissed the plaintiffs’ four state law claims.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: