A Pennsylvania couple accused their servicer of failing to adequately respond to their notice of error and a request for information on behalf of a larger class.
The servicer argued the claims did not involve loan servicing and thus fell outside the scope of the RESPA.
Read on to see why a federal judge ruled the borrowers not only pled plausible allegations, but also were able to show actual damages stemming from the alleged violations which survived the servicer’s motion to dismiss.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: