A Michigan borrower sued her servicer for allegedly failing to properly respond to her qualified written requests and for violating the prohibition on dual tracking by pursuing a foreclosure while simultaneously reviewing her loan modification. The borrower requested actual damages for out-of-pocket expenses photocopying and obtaining certified copies of correspondence; lost time and inconvenience; late fees and denial of credit. She also sought additional statutory damages and attorney’s fees.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: