A California law firm is arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court need not conduct a severability analysis when deciding a case that argues for abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and every regulation enacted by it.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Realtors and other groups warn that bypassing the severability issue would mean TRID and other rulemaking actions could be invalid.
Read on for details from recent court filings in the Seila Law case.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: