A Texas borrower who accused their servicer of proceeding with a foreclosure sale even though their third loan modification application was “facially complete” claimed they suffered three types of actual damages.
The servicer argued the case should be dismissed because the facially complete requirement only applies to a borrower’s first loss mitigation application.
Read on to find out what a magistrate recommended regarding the servicer’s motion for summary judgment on the RESPA claim.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: