An Ohio woman claimed she was forced to incur expenses and damages because she had to hire counsel to send Requests for Information and Notices of Error to determine what went awry in the loss mitigation application process.
The servicer argued that because a foreclosure judgment already had been obtained before it received the RESPA notices from the plaintiff, it is not subject to RESPA.
Read on to see why the judge disagreed with the servicer.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: