Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE Already a subscriber? LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation5

Enforcement Update

Industry to CFPB: More guidance, less enforcement

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
0 comments
Enforcement Update
Monday, August 20, 2018

No more regulation by enforcement.

That was the loud and clear message sent to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from many of the 487 public comments who responded to a request for information (RFI) about the bureau’s enforcement processes.

The CFPB issued a Request for Information (RFI) Feb. 12 from interested parties to consider whether any changes to the processes would be appropriate. The comment period originally closed April 13, but was extended another 30 days at the request of two industry trade associations.

The cart before the horse?

Virginia O’Neill, senior vice president at the American Bankers Association’s (ABA) Center for Regulatory Compliance, said the bureau needs to rethink its relationship between enforcement, regulations and guidance.

“To date, the bureau has often had it backwards, using enforcement actions to provide guidance on how to comply with the law,” O’Neill wrote. “This has proven to be an inefficient and ‘cart-before-the-horse’ way to provide such direction. Going forward, the bureau should use regulations to establish legal requirements, and guidance to aid in the understanding of the regulations and how they are applied. Together, regulations and guidance provide a road map for compliance that financial providers can access and understand.”

O’Neill called the bureau’s tendency to provide guidance through consent orders misguided and overly adversarial.

“Consent orders do not actually provide ‘detailed guidance,’ but only a highly specific and highly negotiated account of how one party allegedly violated the law,” she said in her comment letter.

She added, “Consumers are better off when the bureau guides financial institutions towards compliant conduct in the first place, rather than waiting for harm to occur, conducting an investigation, and then suing a financial institution to obtain consumer refunds.”

To start with, O’Neill recommended reducing the bureau’s reliance on the prohibition on unfair, deceptive and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP) to bring enforcement actions, arguing that many UDAAP cases have stretched “unfair” and “deceptive” beyond their known meaning.

“Before bringing an enforcement action, the bureau should ask itself a simple question: ‘How could the defendant have known that the relevant conduct was illegal?’ ” O’Neill wrote. “This simple question would have prevented the debacle of the bureau’s enforcement case against PHH, in which a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the bureau’s interpretation of law was inconsistent with the statutory text, industry practice, prior interpretations by the federal government, and the statute’s purposes and legislative history.”

RESPRO President and Executive Director Ken Trepeta said enforcement must be based on clear-cut violations of the law as commonly interpreted.

“The bureau may be relatively new but RESPA is 44 years old and has much case law and decades of best practices to back it up,” Trepeta said in his letter. “Its meaning should not be altered by novel interpretations during enforcement efforts and, in particular, in consent orders.”

‘Prosecute, not persecute’

 “If the bureau wants to expand upon the interpretations or meaning of RESPA it should engage in a notice-and-comment process and provide written guidance,” Trepeta wrote. “If it is seeking to change the meaning of RESPA, it should bring the matter to Congress.”

Trepeta noted that many companies accused of wrongdoing feel forced to settle because the cost of litigation can exceed the money it would cost to end the proceedings.

“The bureau needs to use a scalpel and not a bludgeon in its enforcement,” Trepeta wrote. “It should prosecute genuine and clear-cut violations, period. It should not engage in wars of attrition with its regulated entities. It should not serve as a make work program for class-action attorneys. It should provide clear guidance consistent with long-held interpretations of RESPA. It should seek to correct behavior where there are minor or arguable infractions, especially when there is no demonstrable or quantifiable harm to consumers. It should prosecute and not persecute. Finally, it should seek to impose as little cost as possible, since those costs are born by the very consumers the bureau purports to protect.”

David Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), said consent orders – and any accompanying news release – should be crafted more carefully to accurately and objectively reflect the terms of the settlement and nothing more.

The bureau’s ombudsman has received complaints alleging the CFPB tends to embellish details in press releases announcing the consent orders.

“Given that the bureau will not negotiate the terms of the press release that accompanies the consent order, and that the press release may be the only document quoted in news stories about a particular settlement, it is critical that the bureau’s press releases accurately reflect the content and meaning of consent orders,” Stevens wrote. “Press releases that deviate from the exact content set forth in the consent order sow confusion for those seeking to understand the consent order, and can unfairly sully the settling company’s reputation.”

Overhaul NORA?

Another consensus from writers was that the Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) process is applied inconsistently, offers institutions few specific details about illegality and has numerous other problems.

“Institutions should not be forced into settlement discussions prior to receiving a full understanding regarding the nature of the alleged violations,” Stevens said in his letter.

Stevens suggested the bureau allow companies at least 30 to 45 days to respond to a NORA, rather than the current 14-day timeline. He also suggested doing away with the 40-page limit on responses.

In addition, MBA recommends the bureau always allow subjects of potential enforcement actions the right to make an in-person presentation before a decision is made to initiate legal action.

The Financial Services Roundtable, Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and Consumer Mortgage Coalition jointly suggested the bureau require that the NORA call and NORA letter include the specific provisions of laws allegedly violated, citations to specific evidence relied upon and an application of the law to the specific evidence that demonstrates the alleged violation.

Those agencies were also among those suggesting the bureau implement a formal civil money penalties (CMP) and restitution matrix through the rulemaking process, and require enforcement provide companies with a written basis for any proposed CMPs.

“The goals of the bureau and the rights of the regulated would both be better served if the bureau was more rigorous and transparent about how it arrives at proposed CMPs,” O’Neill wrote. “The CMPs available to the bureau are governed by broad standards and a set of mitigating factors. However, the bureau has not adopted standards for applying those criteria to particular cases, nor explained its reasoning when it imposes CMPs in individual consent orders.”

Meanwhile, New York State Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo urged the CFPB to keep enforcing federal consumer financial laws the same way.

“The bureau’s enforcement successes have gradually helped restore trust in financial services, which has remained relatively low since the financial crisis,” Vullo said in her comment letter. “The crisis left Americans angry and, along with the rest of the world, distrustful of the financial services industry. Polls year after year show that the bureau has ‘overwhelming and bipartisan support … for regulation and oversight of the financial services industry.’ The bureau’s work obtaining relief for consumers has been credited with contributing to rising American trust in the financial services industry.”

Today's other top stories
HUD’s fair housing rollbacks face opposition from state AGs
CFPB withdraws $95 million consent order against credit union
NAR economist analyzes first-time homebuyer misconceptions
June Optimal Blue report shows increased refi, loan sales
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac create new company


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Be the first to leave a comment.

Leave your comment
Please enter a comment.
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please enter the word displayed in the image above. Please enter the word displayed in the image above.
: 
Please enter your name.
: 
Please enter your email address.
This field must contain a valid email address.
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 2038 times.

Monthly Newsletter

RESPA News Monthly
July 2025

Cover Story:

Attorney responds to judge denying motion to vacate Townstone settlement


News by Topic   News by Edition   In-depth Reports   Events   Subscribe
All Rise
Case Law
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
The Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
 
 
RESPA News Monthly
May 2025
RESPA News Monthly
June 2025
RESPA News Monthly
July 2025
Archives
 
2025 State of the Industry
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Archives
 
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
Library       RESPA Defined   About   Other Publications
NAR Settlement Resources
Affiliated Compliance
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Case Law
CFPB Guidance Documents
Enforcement Documents
Federal and State Legislation
Federal Register Notices
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
 
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Model Disclosure Forms
Other Guidance Documents
Position Papers
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Proposed Rules and Regulations
Settlement Agreements
Statements of Policy
Studies and Proposals
 
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
 
RESPA News
Contact / Editors
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
The Title Report
The Legal Description
Valuation Review
Dodd Frank Upate
Copyright © 2005-2025 RESPA News
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.respanews.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> Dodd Frank Update
> The Legal Description
> The Title Report
> Valuation Review
> NS3 The Summit
> Women's Leadership Summit
> October Research, LLC
> The October Store


Loading... Loading...
12 USC Section 2605 or Section 6 is titled Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of escrow accounts. It pertains to qualified written requests, notices of transfer of servicing and the administration of escrow accounts.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
An arrangement that involves a person who is in a position to refer business as part of a real estate settlement service and who has an interest in a settlement services provider.

In the arrangement, the person, who has either an affiliate relationship with or a direct or beneficial ownership interest of more than one percent in a settlement services provider, directly or indirectly refers business to that provider or influences a consumer to select that provider.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
A mortgage disclosure that lists all estimated charges and fees associated with your loan. In addition to fees and charges, it will list your loan amount, mortgage rate, loan term and estimated monthly payment. Your escrows due at closing for insurance and taxes will also be outlined. Mortgage lenders are legally required to provide a GFE within three days of receiving your application.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
Under RESPA Section 2605(e)(1)(B), a qualified written request is a written correspondence that includes: 1) the name and account of the borrower, or has enough information to allow the servicer identify that information; and 2) a statement of the reasons for the belief of the borrower that the account is in error or provides sufficient detail to the servicer regarding other information sought by the borrower.

A QWR cannot be written on a payment coupon or other payment medium supplied by the servicer.
12 USC Section 2609 or Section 10 is titled Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts. It governs escrow accounts including notifications and statements to borrowers. Section 10 also sets out penalties for those who violate the section.
RESPA Section 3 provides that a thing of value includes any payment, advance, funds, loan, service or other consideration

Regulation X says thing of value includes: monies, things, discounts, salaries, commissions, fees, duplicate payments of a charge, stock, dividends, distributions of partnership profits, franchise royalties, credits representing monies that may be paid at a future date, the opportunity to participate in a money-making program, retained or increased earnings, increased equity in a parent or subsidiary entity, special bank deposits or accounts, special or unusual banking terms, services of all types at special or free rates, sales or rentals at special prices or rates, lease or rental payments based in whole or in part on the amount of business referred, trips and payment of another person’s expenses or reduction in credit against an existing obligation.
A form used by a settlement or closing agent itemizing all charges imposed on a borrower and seller in a real estate transaction. This form represents the closing transaction and provides each party with a complete list of incoming and outgoing funds. RESPA requires the HUD-1 to be used as the standard real estate settlement form in all transactions in the U.S. involving federally related mortgage loans.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
EVENTS
LIBRARY
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
All Rise
Case Law
Conference Coverage
Enforcement Update
Industry News
Legislation
Regulatory News
This Week in Washington
The TRID Journey
TILA News
Current Edition
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
Archives
2025 State of the Industry
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
The ABCs of RESPA
Fair Lending
Mortgage Technology
Best Practices
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
2025 Economic Outlook Series
Evolving Realtor Relationships
CFPB's Shake-Up & Its Impact
Artificial Intelligence for Title
Industry and Regulatory Outlook
RESPA Updates You Need to Know
Evolving Consumer Relationships
Strategies post-NAR settlement
Excess Equity
Securing Your Cyber Network
2024 Economic Forecast Series
Webinar Archives
Cyber Solutions Showcase
NAR Settlement Resources
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Executive Interview Series
eClosing Solutions Showcase
RESPA DEFINED
Affiliated Compliance
Case Law
Disclosure Forms
Enforcement
Federal and State Legislation
Guidance Documents
HUD's FAQ's - General
HUD's RESPA final rule FAQs
In-Depth Reports
Position Papers and Studies
Rules and Regulations
Timeline of revisions
Disclosure requirements
Prohibited practices
RESPA enforcement
Dodd-Frank Amendments
RESPA Glossary
Current Issues
The RESPA Statute
Model Disclosure Forms
Proposed Disclosure Forms
Enforcement Documents
Settlement Agreements
CFPB Guidance Documents
Other Guidance Documents
Statements of Policy
Position Papers
Studies and Proposals
Federal Register Notices
Proposed Rules and Regulations
RESPA News
Contact Us
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement