In a case which involves two parties of a marketing services agreement suing for non-performance of the other, a U.S. district court in Colorado was asked first to rule upon where the case should be contested, and then whether Quicken Loans would be compelled to provide details of other marketing services agreements it has to determine whether Re/Max was in compliance with its agreement.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe recently ruled on the motion to compel, granting it in part and denying it in part.
Both sides followed up with a confidentiality agreement that would address handling the documents Quicken Loans would be compelled to share.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: