Can the mere provision of a real estate contract by settlement service providers establish a violation of RESPA’s required-use prohibition? When a Pennsylvania couple discovered undisclosed water damage to their newly purchased home, they filed suit against a relocation company for allegedly requiring at closing that title insurance be provided by a specific company. They also sued their title company for failing to disclose an alleged AfBA. But were their claims all wet? Read on as the court airs out RESPA Sections 2607 and 2608.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: